Permissive situations and direct doxastic control. Credal Voluntarism and the Christian Faith. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 524–541. The International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 30, 159–168. The analogy argument for doxastic voluntarism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(2), 312–334. Moser (Eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (pp. God and the Philosophers: The Reconciliation of Faith and Reason. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5(2), 147–157. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(1), 1–37.
Believing in Accord with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism. Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification. The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. In Reason & Responsibility, 7th edition (Joel Feinberg, ed.). You Bet Your Life: Pascal’s Wager Defended. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95(3), 529–542. In defense of practical reasons for belief. A counterexample to the uniqueness thesis. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism (Stephen Bullivant and Michael Ruse, eds.). Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd ed. Pascal’s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. The International Philosophical Quarterly, 31, 309–317. The many-gods objection and Pascal’s wager. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36, 167–188. Religious conversion, self-deception, and Pascal’s wager. In The Will to Believe and Other Essays (F. In The Routledge Handbook for the Philosophy of Evidence (Clayton Littlejohn and Maria Lasonen-Aarnio, eds.). Permissivism, Underdetermination, and Evidence. A defense of intrapersonal belief permissivism. Belief and credence: why the attitude-type matters. The European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 8(4), 85–105. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary, 35(1), 149–187. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87(1), 45–74. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, Truth and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue (pp. The Presumption of Atheism and Other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality. Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts? In A. On the epistemic significance of agreement with exceptional theistic philosophers. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue (pp. Voluntary Belief and Epistemic Evaluation. The Many-Gods Objection to Pascal’s Wager: A Defeat, then a Resurrection. An argument for uniqueness about evidential support. American Philosophical Quarterly, 47(2), 119–134.ĭogramaci, S., & Horowitz, S.
Two solutions to the problem of divine hiddenness. Non-evidential believing and permissivism about evidence: a reply to Dan-Johan Eklund. Contemporary Review, 29, 289–309.Ĭockayne, J., Efrid, D., Molto, D., Tamburro, R., & Warman, J. Philosophers Who Believe: The Spiritual Journey of 11 Leading Thinkers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(1), 54–74.Ĭlark, K. Journal of Philosophical Research, 29, 173–190.Ĭallahan, Laura. Faith and Reason: Philosophers Explain Their Turn to Catholicism. Oxford University Press.īesong, B., & Fuqua, J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology (pp. Pragmatic Encroachment and Theistic Knowledge. Why is belief involuntary? Analysis, 50(2), 87–107.īenton, M. Harrison (Eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion (pp. Many Gods, Many Wagers: Pascal’s Wager Meets the Replicator Dynamics. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 257–299.Īng, D. The deontological conception of epistemic justification.
0 kommentar(er)
